Understanding the costs of developing eLearning modules
Below are some examples of interactivity created by Captovate.
Drag and drop
Simulation
Screencasts
We can record the interaction with the interfaces, and include instructions. This is particularly effective when combined with a simulation - so we teach learners how to do it, and then ask them to complete the steps themselves.
Case studies
Scenarios
Gamification
In this example we created a 3D image of an office place and asked the learner find the example of security breaches.
Sometimes it is also about making dry topics a bit of fun, such as this phishing scenario.
Practice of processes
Knowledge checks and assessments
Be as clear and specific as possible about your project's requirements to ensure you receive an accurate estimate. Keep in mind that investing in high-quality e-learning materials can lead to more effective training and improved outcomes for your organisation, making it a worthwhile investment in the long run.
The cost of eLearning isn’t just about how long it is — it’s shaped by how it’s delivered, who it’s for, and the types of experiences you want to create.
What will it cost?
The honest answer is: it depends — but not in a vague way. The cost of eLearning is shaped by a series of key decisions around delivery, content, design, and experience.
The more clarity you have upfront, the more accurate—and cost-effective—your solution will be.
Below, we break down the key considerations that influence the cost of your eLearning project.
1. Module Length & Structure
The length of your learning is one of the biggest cost drivers.
More content means:
- More scripting
- More design
- More development
- More testing
A useful rule of thumb is:
- 15–25 minutes per module
- ~20 slides (as a guide) per module
This approach:
- Aligns with typical attention spans
- Improves retention
- Reduces file size (important for remote or low-bandwidth users)
For audiences accessing content on mobile devices or in remote locations, shorter modules are especially important for usability and engagement.
2. Delivery Model (LMS vs Website vs Hybrid)
How your learning is delivered has a significant impact on both functionality and cost.
LMS (Learning Management System)
- Tracks progress, completion, and assessment results
- Supports structured learning pathways
- Enables reporting and compliance tracking
Website Delivery
- More accessible for public audiences
- Limited tracking (typically completion only)
- Requires workarounds for certificates and engagement tracking
Hybrid Approach
- Supports both internal (LMS) and external (web) audiences
- Requires additional setup, configuration, and testing
An alternative for external audiences is embedding videos, text and resources directly into your website. This can be more streamlined, but may be limited by:
- Access to your web platform
- Functionality constraints
- Reduced data capture
Clarifying your delivery approach early is critical, as it directly impacts development effort and cost.
3. Content Development (SMEs vs Educational Design)
One of the most important distinctions in eLearning projects is:
Who creates the content, and who designs the learning?
Subject Matter Experts (SMEs)
- Provide the knowledge, policy and lived experience
- Ensure accuracy and cultural integrity
- Review and approve content
Instructional Designers
- Translate content into engaging learning experiences
- Structure information into logical, digestible formats
- Design storytelling, interactions and flow
If your provider is required to:
- Develop content from scratch
- Source SMEs
- Facilitate consultation processes
…this will increase scope and cost.
Clear role definition upfront helps streamline the process and avoid duplication.
4. Multimedia & Visual Storytelling
Visual storytelling is central to effective learning—but it’s also one of the biggest variables in cost.
Live Video (On Location)
- Filming in communities or workplaces
- Travel and coordination
- Professional production and editing
This creates strong engagement but comes with higher cost and complexity.
Hybrid Approach (Recommended)
- Combine selected live video with:
- Animation or illustrated storytelling
- Avatars or guided narration
- Voiceover-led content
This balances authenticity with flexibility and cost efficiency.
Fully Illustrated / Animated
- No filming required
- Greater control over visuals
- Easier to update over time
Cultural Considerations
When working with First Nations communities, there are important cultural protocols to consider—particularly regarding the use of imagery of individuals who may pass away.
In some cases, this can result in content needing to be removed or replaced in the future.
This is an important factor when deciding between:
- Real people in video or imagery
- Illustrated or avatar-based storytelling
5. Interactivity
“Interactive” can mean different things to different people, so it’s important to define what this looks like for your project.
Basic
- Click-through content
- Simple quizzes
Moderate
- Case studies
- Scenario-based questions
- Decision-making pathways
Advanced
- Simulations
- Complex branching scenarios
- Role-based learning experiences
Providing real-life examples or scenarios is one of the best ways to create meaningful interactivity.
6. Knowledge Checks & Assessment
Consider:
- How often you want knowledge checks
- Whether you need a final assessment
- Whether results need to be tracked
Embedding knowledge checks throughout the module is a great way to reinforce learning.
However, if tracking results is important, this typically requires an LMS. Website-based delivery has more limited capability in this area.
7. Avatars & Characters
Using characters can make learning more relatable and engaging.
Options include:
- Low cost: Standard characters (e.g. built into tools like Articulate)
- Medium cost: Real images of people
- Higher cost: Custom illustrated characters
Avatars can also:
- Support storytelling
- Reduce reliance on real individuals
- Improve longevity of content
8. Voiceovers
Voiceovers add depth and accessibility to your learning.
AI Voiceovers
- Faster to produce and update
- More cost-effective
- Increasingly natural, but may lack cultural nuance
Real Voiceovers
- More authentic and engaging
- Higher cost (talent, recording, editing)
A hybrid approach is sometimes used depending on content type.
9. Accessibility Requirements
Accessibility is a key consideration, particularly for government projects.
This may include:
- Closed captions
- Full transcripts
- Screen reader compatibility
- Clear visual design
While essential, these requirements do add additional time and cost to development.
Bringing It All Together
eLearning costs aren’t based on a single factor—they’re shaped by a combination of:
- Duration
- Delivery method
- Content readiness
- Multimedia approach
- Level of interactivity
- Accessibility requirements
The more clarity you have across these areas, the more efficient and cost-effective your project will be.
Final Thought
If you’re still working through these decisions, that’s completely normal.
The most successful eLearning projects start with a clear scoping phase—where these elements are explored, tested and refined before development begins.
Getting this right upfront will save time, budget and rework later.
See some examples of interactive functionalities created by Captovate.
Request a link to view a live Rise course and explore examples of our previous projects — including specific features tailored to your needs.





